Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

522 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 522 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Eligibility Communication Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Interpretation of Section 9(c) of DTVSV Act: Pending criminal proceedings without charge-sheet or not relating to tax matters do not bar eligibility.

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a communication dated 21st October 2020 issued by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Student in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(r) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioner, Harsh Anil Singh, a 19-year-old student, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Murder Case on Grounds of Parity and Delay in Trial. Appellants Accused of Murder Under Section 302 IPC and Offences Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Granted Bail as Co-Accused Already Released.

The appellants, accused Nos. 1 and 4, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the NIA Act challenging the order dated 21.04.2021 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Default Bail in POCSO Case — Issues Framed on Section 193(2) BNSS. The Court Examines Whether Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days Entitles Accused to Statutory Bail Despite 90-Day Limit Under Section 187(3)(i) BNSS.

The case arose from a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the BNSS, challenging orders denying de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Plea for Sentence Adaptation Under Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003. Case Involves Interpretation of Section 13(6) and Bilateral Agreement with Mauritius Regarding Transfer of Sentenced Persons.

(1) Background — The case involved a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Government of India, Ministry o...