Search Results for "new tenancy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "new tenancy"

1030 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1030 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order Cancelling Non-Agricultural Permission in Land Revenue Dispute. Held that the Collector lacked jurisdiction to cancel NA permission under Section 65 of Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879, as the land was not 'uncultivable' and permission was granted under Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976.

17 Mar 2026

The case involves two Special Civil Applications filed by Rameshbhai Keshavlal Patel through his Power of Attorney, Nilambhai Narendrabhai Patel, chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Upholding Plaintiff's Title Over Wakf Property. The court held that the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the suit and that the plaintiff's suit was not barred by limitation.

14 Feb 2024

The case involves a dispute over Survey Gut No.66 of village Harsool, Aurangabad. The plaintiff, Pratapsingh s/o Nursing Kakarwal, filed a suit before...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 17(7) Available. Petitioners, as tenants of secured asset, cannot bypass statutory appellate remedy by invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

8 Aug 2017

The petitioners, who were tenants of a property that was a secured asset of the respondent HDB Financial Services Ltd., filed securitisation applicati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Despite Delay in Application. The court held that the limitation period under Section 49 should be liberally construed to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the petitioner's delay in applying for refund was condonable as the transactions never materialized.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against City Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Property Suit — Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction Decided Against Applicant. Court holds that City Civil Court has jurisdiction to try suit for specific performance and injunction where property value exceeds its pecuniary limits but suit was transferred from High Court under Section 15 of Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948.

21 Jan 2015

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendant (applicant) against an order dated 19th May 2014 passed by the learned ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

22 Jul 2010

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Order in Agricultural Land and Property Dispute — Appeals Filed by Legal Heirs of Narayanrao Nanasaheb Mane-Deshmukh Against Multiple Respondents. The appeals arise from orders of the trial court, the nature of which is not specified in the available text.

1 Jan 1970

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

27 28 29 30 31

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)