Search Results for "incorrect statement"

3037 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3037 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court's Rs. 50 Lakh Cost and CBI Probe in Habeas Corpus Case Involving Allegations of Illegal Detention and Political Mudslinging. High Court Had Found the Petition an Abuse of Process, Imposed Costs, and Directed CBI Investigation Against the Petitioner.

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) dated 7 March 2011, dismissing a habeas corpus writ petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Despite Defendant's Preliminary Objections. Plaintiff's Mark 'ESSEL' Found to Have Acquired Distinctiveness and Defendant's Use Likely to Cause Confusion.

The plaintiff, Essel Propack Ltd., filed a suit in 2010 against Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and another defendant for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award. Dispute Related to Charter Hire Agreement for Offshore Drilling, Involving Claims for Lost Equipment, Day Rates, and Demobilisation Fees.

The Bombay High Court considered an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Power of Review Under Arbitration Act. Review petition against judgment setting aside arbitral award dismissed as Arbitration Act is a self-contained code with no review provision, and Section 5 limits judicial intervention.

The review petitioner, Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd., sought recall of the judgment dated 8 November 2019 in Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines PIL Filed by Environmental Group Against State Bodies and Developer. Challenge Pertains to Approvals for Construction of Hotel in Coastal Regulation Zone at Morjim, Goa.

This Public Interest Litigation filed by two environmental petitioners challenges approvals granted for construction of a hotel/beach resort by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows KSRTC Appeal in Property Tax Reassessment Case — Reassessment Notice After 14 Years Held Time-Barred. Commissioner's Power to Reopen Assessment Under Section 112-A(4) of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Must Be Exercised Within a Reasonable Period of 3 Years.

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) appealed against a Single Judge order that upheld the Commissioner's power to reopen property t...