Search Results for "family offences"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "family offences"

4378 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4378 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Foreigners Tribunal Declaration in Assam Nationality Case — Emphasizes Right to Hearing and Burden of Proof Under Section 9 of Foreigners Act, 1946. The Court set aside the ex-parte order of the Tribunal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, holding that the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to be heard.

11 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the Gauhati High Court's dismissal of a writ petition challenging the Foreigners Tribunal's declaration...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Corruption Case: Sanction Under Section 19 PC Act Not Required for Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC. The court held that summoning a public servant under Section 319 CrPC does not amount to taking cognizance, and thus no prior sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is necessary.

8 Jul 2024

The State of Punjab appealed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which set aside the trial court's order summoning Dr. Pratap Si...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses IPS Officer's Challenge to Rejection of Voluntary Retirement. Central Government's Decision to Reject Voluntary Retirement Upheld as Disciplinary Proceedings Were Contemplated and Petitioner Was Not Clear from Vigilance Angle.

15 May 2024

The petitioner, a 1997 batch IPS officer of Maharashtra Cadre, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 7th ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.

21 Jun 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Suit Under Article 131 for Lack of Cause of Action and Suppression of Material Facts. The suit challenging the validity of notifications under the DSPE Act was held not maintainable as the dispute was not between the State and the Union but between the State and its own officers.

10 Jul 2024

The State of West Bengal filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging the validity of notificat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NDMC Appeals in Property Tax Dispute — Upholds Unit Area Method as Valid. The impugned Bye-laws are not ultra vires the NDMC Act, 1994, as they fall within the rule-making power under Section 388 and are consistent with Section 63.

30 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against the Delhi High Court judgment dated August 10, 2017, whi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.

21 Jun 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

High Court

KAHC010059832012_1

21 Jun 2016

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

27 28 29 30 31

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)