Search Results for "distinct commercial goods"

594 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 594 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Termination of Services Agreement by State Assembly Secretariat Held Illegal by Arbitrator; Court's Decision on Frustration and Party Distinctness Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

Background: The dispute arose from an agreement dated 5 December 2015 between the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly (UPLA) Secretariat and Tata Consu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Purely Civil Nature of Dispute — Non-Payment of Dues Does Not Attract Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and its office bearers against the order of the Allahabad High Court which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.

In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Software Implementation Dispute. Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked due to respondent's failure to appoint arbitrator under agreement dated 30 October 2015.

The applicant, SAP India Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...