Search Results for "commercial execution"

1983 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1983 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition for Interim Injunction in Media Rights Dispute; Allegations of Fraud and Collusion Cast Doubt on Validity of Agreements. Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by World Sport Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute Over Hotel Company Exit — Holds That Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Granting Relief Beyond Scope of Reference and Without Proper Valuation.

The judgment pertains to two Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an arbitral award dated 5th April 2016. The petitioners (Panchamias Group a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Challenge to Sections 17(2) and 32(1) Proviso of MMRDA Act by Consent. Land Acquisition by MMRDA Under Challenge: Petitioners Allege Unconstitutional Provisions in MMRDA Act, 1974.

The Bombay High Court heard and disposed of a group of matters comprising Writ Petition No. 841 of 2012, Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...