Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Interim Applications in Property Suits Regarding Appointment of Court Receiver. The Heirs of Sole Proprietor Seek Relief Against Multiple Defendants Including Developers and Property Owners.
3 Nov 2025...
Search Results for "Statutory Tenancy"
1015 result(s) found
Found 1015 result(s)
High Court
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
9 Oct 2015The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...
- 200
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Despite Delay in Application. The court held that the limitation period under Section 49 should be liberally construed to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the petitioner's delay in applying for refund was condonable as the transactions never materialized.
21 Sep 2023The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.
30 Jul 2013The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...
- 214
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.
22 Jul 2010The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.
20 Jul 2026The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Inadequate Market Value Assessment. Court Held That Reference Court Erred in Not Considering Comparable Sale Instances and Potential Value of Land for Development Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
30 Nov -0001The case pertains to a writ petition filed by the legal representatives of the original claimant, Sahadeo Mahadik, challenging the judgment and award ...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.
28 Jul 2016The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.
15 Sep 2005The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...
- 125
