Search Results for "Securitisation"

420 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 420 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Approval for Engineering College Due to Unauthorized Relocation. AICTE's order upheld as petitioners shifted college without prior approval, violating statutory requirements under AICTE Act and University affiliation norms.

The petitioners, Parshvanath Charitable Trust and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 7 Jan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Arbitrator Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. Single Judge Holds Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 Not Exhaustive and Maintains Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The petitioner, M/s. Modern Anitasha Electronics, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Notice Quashed as Based on Mere Change of Opinion Where Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Had Examined Section 54 Exemption Claim.

The petitioner, Gagan Omprakash Navani, an individual assessed to tax, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2016-2017 on 10 April 2017, declar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Debt Recovery Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner failed to deposit amount as directed, and no grounds for review were made out.

The petitioner, M/s MRB Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd., filed a Review Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated 10th June 2015 pas...