Search Results for "Objects Clause"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Objects Clause"

2094 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2094 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

23 Aug 2013

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in BIFR Proceedings — Sale Under Securitisation Act Completed, No Jurisdiction Remains with BIFR. The court held that once action under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation Act is taken to its logical end, BIFR loses jurisdiction, and interim relief cannot be granted to disturb a concluded sale.

19 May 2010

The petitioner, Nouveaw Exports Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Resolution Professional to Continue CIRP Under IBC Despite Pending Winding-Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956. Leave under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 granted to proceed with Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

2 Nov 2018

The judgment concerns Company Application No. 10 of 2017 filed by the Resolution Professional of Murli Industries Limited (the corporate debtor) under...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition by Ex-Employee Challenging DRT Proceedings for Recovery of Alleged Loss Due to Misconduct. The Core Issue Is Whether Such Loss Constitutes a 'Debt' Within the Meaning of Section 2(g) of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

21 Apr 2023

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Review of Concurrent Findings in Forest Land Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. High Court Exceeded Review Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Concurrent Findings of Fact.

22 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, which had revi...

High Court

KAHC010211662021_1

31 Mar 2023

Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

12 Oct 2017

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

27 28 29 30 31

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)