KAHC010168012022_1
3 Sep 2022...
Search Results for "Independent rights"
4066 result(s) found
Found 4066 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Non-Compliance with Section 37 Conditions. The court held that mere disclosure by co-accused without independent evidence does not constitute prima facie case under Section 8(c) read with Rules 22 and 29 of NDPS Act.
7 Feb 2019The applicant, Siraj Shaikh Nasir Munshi, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with C.R. ...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Evidence of Conscious Possession. The court held that the applicant was not present at the time of recovery and the only evidence against him was the inadmissible statement of co-accused, thus the rigours of Section 37 of NDPS Act were not attracted.
7 Feb 2019The applicant, Siraj Shaikh Nasir Munshi, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with C.R. N...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against IGST Demand of Rs.1524 Crores on Arbitration Award Damages. Issue Pertains to Whether Damages Paid Under Deemed Decree Constitute Consideration for Taxable Service Under IGST Act, 2017.
30 Apr 2026The dispute centers on a writ petition filed by Tata Sons Private Limited (Tata) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging an intima...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused No.1 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Upholds Acquittal of Accused No.2 for Abetment. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt for Main Accused, While Complainant's Appeal Against Acquittal of Accused No.2 is Dismissed.
12 Sep 2023The judgment pertains to four connected matters: Criminal Appeal No.579/2019 by accused no.1 Balasaheb Babasaheb Bhagat against his conviction for mur...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Accused No.1's Bail Appeal in Malegaon Bombing Case Charging Conspiracy and Terror Offences. Appeal Questions Special Court's Rejection of Bail Application Pursuant to Supreme Court Direction to Exclude MCOC Act Provisions.
25 Apr 2017The judgment under consideration arises from a criminal appeal filed by Accused No.1 against the Special Court's order rejecting her bail application ...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Will Dispute Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Prove Valid Execution. Will dated 21st March 1989 held not proved as the attesting witness failed to establish due execution and the propounder failed to dispel suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will.
13 Feb 2020The suit was a challenge to a Will dated 21st March 1989 purportedly executed by late Tarapada Chatterjee, who died on 24th August 1990. The plaintiff...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State of Maharashtra's Petition to Quash Part of CBI FIR in Gelatine Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act. Court held that investigation against public servants without prior approval under Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is invalid and liable to be quashed.
22 Jul 2021The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Defamation Process in Companies Act Special Notice Case. The Dispute Involves Allegations Made in a Statutory Notice Under the Companies Act, 2013.
22 Jul 2019Background: The present writ petition arose from a criminal defamation complaint filed by Respondent No.2, Nusli Neville Wadia, against the petitioner...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Constitutional Challenge to Section 31-A of the NDPS Act, 1985, Imposing Mandatory Death Penalty for Repeat Drug Offences. The petition questioned whether mandatory death penalty for non-homicidal drug offences under Section 31-A violates fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
16 Jun 2011The matter involved two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 31-A of the Narc...
- 11
