Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sri Manjunatha Kutta, was convicted by the Special Judge, Bengaluru Urban District, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, P. Somaraju, was an Assistant Commissioner of Labour in Hyderabad. The complainant, S. Venkat Reddy (PW-1), a licensed labour contracto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application and Discharges Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction for Prosecution. The court held that sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory for prosecuting a public servant, and its absence vitiates the proceedings.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Sunil Achyutrao Thete, who was charged with offences under Sections 7, 12, 15, 13(1)(d) rea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Health Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anil Ramchandra Orape, a Health Inspector with the Pune Municipal Corporation, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune on 30/12/1997 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order Against Public Servants in Private Complaint for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants is Mandatory for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duty.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed by the petitioners (accused No.2, 3 and 4) challenging the order dated 13.4.2012 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Motor Vehicle Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Balchandra Ramdas Jain, a Motor Vehicle Inspector, for offences under Section 161 IPC and S...