Search Results for "Hurt"

1314 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1314 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Ransom Demand Under Sections 363, 364A, 120B IPC — Appellant Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Abducting Minor Son of Factory Owner and Demanding Rs. 1 Lakh Ransom.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammed Mosin Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 363, 364A r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Ex-Chief Minister and MLA in Prison Assault Case Due to Bar Under Prisons Act, 1894. Alleged Offences Committed Inside Notified Temporary Prison Must Be Dealt With Under Special Statute, Not General Criminal Law.

The Bombay High Court allowed two applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by accused No. 1 (an ex-Chief Minister)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Raju @ Rakesh Dhaniram Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for offences punishable under Section 364-A (kidna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay, Non-Consideration of Bail Order, and Violation of Article 22(5). Detaining Authority Failed to Communicate Representation Decision and Consider Bail Order; Violated Petitioner's Constitutional Right.

The case pertained to a writ of habeas corpus filed by the detenu challenging a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangero...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Sets Aside Conviction in Fatal Jeep Accident Case Due to Unproven Medical Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. The court held that reversal of acquittal was unjustified when post-mortem report was not proved and only one eyewitness supported the prosecution.

The applicant, Anita Sopan Ravalekar, was initially acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhor, for offences under Sections 279, 304A, 337...