High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition No. 403 of 2022 and P.I.L. Writ Petition No. 32 of 2022. The Court adjudicated connected matters involving multiple respondents and state/government authorities.
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "Central Board"
4781 result(s) found
Found 4781 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Sets Aside Waqf Tribunal Order for Lack of Reasoned Decision and Remands for Fresh Enquiry Under Section 40. Non-speaking resolution by Waqf Board without proper enquiry into whether properties were private or public waqf necessitated remand for fresh determination.
27 Feb 2026The dispute centred on the nature of waqf over certain properties. The original petitioner, M. Sirajudeen Sayeed (since deceased, represented by legal...
- 15
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Punjab Wakf Board, Holds Wakf Tribunal Has Jurisdiction Over Suits for Possession of Wakf Property. The Court distinguished Ramesh Gobindram and held that under the Wakf Act, 1995, the Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes relating to wakf property, even against non-Muslim lessees.
7 Feb 2019The Supreme Court allowed two appeals filed by the Punjab Wakf Board against separate judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The High Court h...
- 166
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Goa University's Challenge to Town Planning Board Directions and Allows Dr. Shetye's Complaint Regarding Illegal Compound Wall. The Court held that the University's construction of a compound wall without leaving access to neighboring properties was unauthorized and that the regularization order did not legalize the wall without proper plans.
25 Nov 2024The judgment concerns two writ petitions: WP No.414/2023 filed by Goa University challenging an order of the Town and Country Planning Board dated 20....
- 411
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Issues Directions for Migrant Labourers in Suo Motu Writ Petition During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court ordered transportation, food provision, and withdrawal of prosecutions under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to address miseries caused by lockdown and pandemic fears.
29 Jun 2021The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the severe hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which...
- 230
High Court
KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
- 50
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PIT-NDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside Due to Failure to Consider Pending Bail Application and Unexplained Delay in Forwarding Representation.
3 Jul 2020The petitioner, a Nigerian national, was detained under Section 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances A...
- 230
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in School Affiliation Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Delayed Filing. Applicant appointed as temporary secretary after alleged offences, no specific role attributed, FIR filed after 3 years without explanation.
16 Mar 2026The applicant, Ketan Harkantbhai Joshi, filed a Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 11208055220187 of 2022 r...
- 128
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Upholding Plaintiff's Title Over Wakf Property. The court held that the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the suit and that the plaintiff's suit was not barred by limitation.
14 Feb 2024The case involves a dispute over Survey Gut No.66 of village Harsool, Aurangabad. The plaintiff, Pratapsingh s/o Nursing Kakarwal, filed a suit before...
- 42
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Supply of Vital Material and Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as statements of key witness not furnished to detenu, violating Article 22(5) right to make effective representation.
31 Jul 2024The appellant, wife of detenu Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji, challenged the detention order dated 31.08.2023 passed under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA b...
- 3581
