Writ petitions filed by various individuals claiming freedom fighter status against the District Collector, Beed, the Freedom Fighters' High Power Committee, the One Man Commission, and the State of Maharashtra.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Building Proposals"
670 result(s) found
Found 670 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Examines Whether Forest Areas Must Be Notified as Tiger Reserve Under Section 38-V of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Petition filed in public interest claimed that State's failure to notify Mhadei Wildlife Sanctuary after National Tiger Conservation Authority recommendations violated statutory duty and led to tiger deaths.
24 Jul 2023The High Court of Bombay at Goa, comprising M. S. Sonak and Bharat P. Deshpande, JJ., heard a public interest litigation filed by The Goa Foundation t...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Employee — Employee Cannot Be Forced to Accept Lower Post After Long Service as Clerk-cum-Typist. The Industrial Court's direction under Items 5, 6, 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 was upheld as the employee had worked as Clerk-cum-Typist since 1991.
22 Aug 2019The State of Maharashtra and its forest department officials filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's judgment dated 11/02/2005 in Com...
- 88
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 97
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
3 Dec 2015The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...
- 112
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.
28 Apr 2026The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...
- 214
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Automobile Dealers Challenging Labour Court Awards of Back Wages and Reinstatement. Retrenchment of Workmen Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
28 Oct 2016The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various automobile dealership companies (petitioners) challenging common awards passed by the Lab...
- 81
High Court
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Education Officer to Decide Reimbursement Claims Under Section 12 of RTE Act, 2009 Within Four Weeks. School Management's Claims for Reimbursement of Fees for Students Admitted Under the RTE Act Must Be Decided Expeditiously to Fulfill the Purpose of the Act.
17 Nov 2025The petitioners, a school management and its trust, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur seeking a direction for reimburseme...
- 257
