Search Results for "Article 265"

450 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 450 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order Permitting Counter-Claim in Property Dispute -- Counter-Claim After Issues Framed and Against Co-Defendant Held Not Maintainable Under CPC

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court of Gujarat's order that permitted defendant no. 2 to amend his written statement and file a counter-claim in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Bribery Case After Exoneration in Departmental Enquiry. Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as Identical Charges Could Not Be Established in Prior Enquiry and Tribunal Found No Evidence of Demand/Acceptance of Bribe.

The petitioner, a public servant working as a Tahasildar, was implicated in a bribery case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. A complaint w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Passport Renewal Petition Despite Pending Criminal Proceedings — Rejection Without Reasons Violates Right to Travel Under Article 21. Passport Authority Directed to Consider Application Afresh Under Section 6(2)(f) of Passports Act, 1967.

The petitioner, Smt. Kasturi Rajupeta, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Suo Moto PIL on Police Deficiencies, Notes State’s Efforts to Strengthen Force. Court Holds That State Government Has Taken Maximum Steps to Recruit Police Personnel and Modernize Force, Disposes of Petition with Liberty to Apply.

The Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a suo moto public interest litigation initiated in 2008 on the basis of a newspa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Unstamped MOU. Stamp Objection Is for Arbitral Tribunal to Decide, Not a Bar to Appointment of Arbitrator.

The applicants, Nilesh Shantilal Tank and Praful Shantilal Tank, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order Due to Insufficiently Stamped MOU. Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Underlying Agreement Was Insufficiently Stamped Under Section 35 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The appeal arose from an order dated 30 August 2013 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Thane, allowing an application filed by the respon...