Search Results for "single transaction rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1678 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Dismissing Application for Return of Plaint in Commercial Suit — Territorial Jurisdiction of Commercial Court Determined by Principal Civil Court Under Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Court held that since the suit property was situated in England and no cause of action arose in Bengaluru, the Commercial Court lacked territorial jurisdiction, and the plaint must be returned for presentation before the competent court.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioners, M/s Tefilah Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director Siddhartha Gupta, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

High Court

KAHC010822332025_1

8 Jul 2026

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitral Award Challenge — No Automatic Stay Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act Without Strong Prima Facie Case. Court holds that mere filing of Section 34 petition does not warrant stay; applicant must demonstrate irreparable harm and balance of convenience.

14 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns an interim application filed by Kishor N Shah and others (the Shahs) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court held that the appellants failed to prove their title over the suit property and that the sale deed executed by the original owner in favor of the respondents was valid.

23 Dec 2014

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land. They claimed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BCCI's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Media Rights Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that termination of Media Rights License Agreement was illegal and that Nimbus Communications was entitled to damages.

7 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Section 9 Application for Injunction. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement and prima facie case for interim relief must be considered at the stage of Section 9 application, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application without considering the merits.

2 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s Equestrain Centre for Excellence, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reopening of Partition Permitted Due to Non-Inclusion of Joint Family Property. The Court held that a prior partition decree not binding on the plaintiff as she was not a party and the property was joint family property.

9 Oct 2017

The appellant, Monakka Shinde, filed a suit (O.S. 370/2004) for reopening of partition, declaration, and injunction against her sons, Maruti Shinde an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.

4 Dec 2018

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)