Search Results for "service tax recovery"

1146 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1146 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Review Jurisdiction Improperly Exercised by High Court. The Court held that the High Court's review order did not satisfy the grounds under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and was an abuse of process.

The present appeal arises from a long-standing property dispute concerning premises No. 43, Prithviraj Road, New Delhi. The property originally belong...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Council's Petition Challenging Ex Parte Stay in Rent Revision Appeals — Pre-deposit Under Section 170 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Mandatory Before Entertaining Appeals Against Rent Demands.

The Municipal Council, Achalpur filed a writ petition seeking to treat it as a representative petition for 74 appeals filed against it by occupiers/al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows NDMC Appeals in Property Tax Dispute — Upholds Unit Area Method as Valid. The impugned Bye-laws are not ultra vires the NDMC Act, 1994, as they fall within the rule-making power under Section 388 and are consistent with Section 63.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against the Delhi High Court judgment dated August 10, 2017, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...