Search Results for "retrospective policy"

483 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Extension of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Even After Award Rendered Beyond Statutory Time Limit -- Court Reverses High Court Decision Setting Aside Award

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's orders, holding that a court can entertain an application under Section 29A(5) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SC/ST Commission Order in Service Dispute — Commission Exceeded Jurisdiction by Directing Promotion and Seniority. Held that the Commission under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 cannot adjudicate service matters or direct promotions.

The petitioner, Sri M.B. Siddalingaswamy, a Scheduled Caste employee working as Superintendent in the Department of Pre-University Education, Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Demand for Enhanced Casino Licence Fees Based on Amended Notification Without Retrospective Effect. Notification under Section 13A of the Goa, Daman & Diu Public Gambling Act, 1976 cannot apply to existing licences; recovery set aside.

The petitioners, Advani Hotels & Resorts India Ltd. and its Chairman, operated an onshore casino named 'Goa Nugget' at Caravela Beach Resort in Goa un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ombudsman Report in Seniority Dispute — Seniority Determined by Date of Joining, Not Date of Recommendation by Public Service Commission.

The petitioners, including Maya M. Pednekar and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the report dated 16.02.2...