KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
Search Results for "registry procedure"
1622 result(s) found
Found 1622 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Contempt Proceedings — Impleadment of Sitting Judge Not Permissible in Suo Motu Contempt. Filing of Scandalous Application Against Judge Constitutes Fresh Contempt and Professional Misconduct.
20 Apr 2026The appellant, an advocate, filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1612 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court on behalf of his client seeking a CBI inve...
- 156
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Applicability of Written Statement Time Limit to Counter-Claim in Commercial Suits. The Court Examined Whether the 120-Day Limit Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Applies to Plaintiffs' Reply to Counter-Claims Governed by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
19 Jul 2026This matter arose from a commercial suit for recovery of money filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants). The defendan...
- 20
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Convicts Contemnors for Scandalous Allegations Against Judges in Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings. The Court upheld its inherent power under Article 129 to punish for contempt, rejecting procedural objections under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
27 Apr 2020The Supreme Court of India initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Vijay Kurle, Rashid Khan Pathan, and Nilesh Ojha for sending letters contai...
- 262
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 21 of NIA Act as Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Order. The court held that an order on an interlocutory application under Section 20 of the NIA Act is not a final judgment and thus not appealable under Section 21 of the Act.
29 Mar 2022The case involves a criminal appeal filed under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (NIA Act) by four appellants, Irfan Pasha, W...
- 110
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.
9 Dec 2022The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...
- 162
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Remission of Court Fees for Army Officer's Wife Under State Notification — 'Wholly Dependent' Includes Physical and Emotional Support, Not Just Financial Dependence. The Court held that the Plaintiff, wife of an Indian Army Officer, was entitled to exemption from court fees under the Notification dated 11.11.1965 as she was wholly dependent on her husband, despite her past employment and assets.
4 Jul 2024The Petitioner, the wife of an Indian Army Officer, filed Special Civil Suit No. 2401/2023 seeking declaratory relief, damages, reinstatement, and inj...
- 549
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Allowances for Judicial Officers as Recommended by Second National Judicial Pay Commission. The Court rejected objections based on financial burden and equivalence with other government officers, holding that providing service conditions is a mandatory state duty essential for judicial functions and rule of law.
4 Jan 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, addressed objections from the Union Government and State Gove...
- 401
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application by Municipal Corporation Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 235 Days in Filing Appeal Not Explained with Affidavit or Proper Grounds, Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5.
17 Jan 2006The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai filed an application for condonation of delay of 235 days in filing a first appeal against a decision of t...
- 104
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Insurance Company's SLP Against NCDRC Order, Holds Remedy Lies Under Article 226/227 Not Article 136. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(a) - National Commission's appellate orders are not subject to Article 136 jurisdiction directly.
1 Jan 2023The case arises from a consumer dispute where the complainant, Suresh Chand Jain, had obtained a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy and a Burglar...
- 165
