Search Results for "recovery impermissible"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "recovery impermissible"

765 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 765 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Unsuccessful Party's Section 9 Petition in Arbitration Dispute — Maintainability Upheld After Supreme Court's Home Care Retail Marts Judgment. The court held that a losing party can seek interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, overruling the earlier Division Bench decision in Dirk India.

6 May 2026

The judgment arises from a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) against Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Rate in Land Dispute Under Compromise Decree — Guideline Value Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Fixed at Rs. 750 per Square Foot. Court Holds That Executing Court Erred in Applying Subsequent Notification and High Court's Reduction Was Unwarranted, Directs Payment of Average Guideline Value.

30 Apr 2026

The case involves a dispute between Appellants (N.I.C.E.) and the decree holders, Respondents, arising from a compromise decree in a suit for permanen...

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank Officials and BGR Energy Executives in Bank Guarantee Dispute -- No Criminal Intent Found in Commercial Transaction Under IPC Sections 420, 403, 406, 418, 425, 427 read with 34

23 Feb 2026

The High Court quashed an FIR registered against bank officials and company executives alleging criminal offences in connection with bank guarantee tr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Quashing Petitions Against Multiple FIRs Registered Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Challenge Focuses on Validity of FIR Registration Based on Request to Court Rather Than on Complaint Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.

8 Sep 2021

The matter comprised three criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Sri Prabhu Shankar, an Assistant Com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition with Costs in Arbitration Appointment Case. Review Petition Found Misconceived, Mischievous, and Vexatious Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

4 Aug 2021

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Review Petition filed by Priyanka Communications (India) Pvt Ltd and others (the Agarwals) against an order appointi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Borrower's Leasehold Interest Not Affected. The court held that the petitioner, claiming to be the owner of the property leased to the borrower, had no locus standi to challenge the DRT order under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the lease was created after the mortgage and the petitioner was not a party to the proceedings.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Sri Rameshchandra, claiming to be the owner of a property, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

2 Nov 2018

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order in Forest Department Recruitment Case. Court upholds CAT's direction to consider respondents for promotion to Forester posts based on seniority and eligibility as per Recruitment Rules.

1 Mar 2018

The State of Maharashtra and forest department officials filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Court's Injunction Against Bank's Recovery Notice Despite SARFAESI Proceedings — Jurisdiction of Cooperative Court Not Ousted by SARFAESI Act for Disputes Under Section 91 of MCS Act.

24 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Shewalkar Developers Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in land development and construction...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Venture Capital Fund — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Applicability of Section 10(23FB) Exemption is Invalid.

14 Jun 2013

The petitioner, DHFL Venture Capital Fund, is a trust registered as a venture capital fund under SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations, 1996. It fil...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)