KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "managing partner"
603 result(s) found
Found 603 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in VAT/GST Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds That Proof of Payment Can Be Produced Before First Hearing. The Court ruled that the requirement to deposit 12.5% of the disputed tax under the second proviso of Section 19 of the APGST Act, 1957 does not mandate payment within the limitation period for filing the appeal, but only before the appeal is first taken up for consideration.
10 Jul 2019The Supreme Court considered a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Appellate Authority under the APGST Act, 1957, AP VAT Act, 2005, and ...
- 258
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Excise License Fee Hike — License Fee Enhancement for CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 Licenses Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 17 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. Court Held That the Fee Is a Privilege Fee and Not a Tax, and the Government's Policy Decision Is Not Arbitrary.
24 Jun 2014The petitioners, who are holders of CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 excise licenses for retail sale of liquor and bars/restaurants in Hubli and Gadag districts, ...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Remand Order in Civil Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed - Directs Trial Court to Decide Based on Existing Evidence. The Court held that remand for de novo trial was unjustified as the Trial Court had already recorded evidence and decided on merits under Section 103 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, with no exceptional circumstances present.
27 Feb 2023The appeal arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Kerala dated 28.06.2019, which disposed of four appeals related to civil suits between si...
- 230
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.
19 Aug 2020The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...
- 283
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 64
High Court
- 61
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 47
High Court
High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations
25 Feb 2026The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...
- 593
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires that demand notice be served on the drawer within 30 days of dishonour; failure to prove service renders complaint not maintainable.
8 Nov 2024The petitioners, Jai Agarwal and Anjana Agarwal, filed criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (read with Section...
- 154
