Search Results for "inconsistent testimonies"

460 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 460 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Rash and Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident on 30.10.2016 at about 2.15 p.m. on Mohanur to Karur Road near Vangal Bridge. The defacto complainant Jagadeeswar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Test Identification Parade. Homicidal Death Established but Identity of Accused Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 450 IPC.

The case involves a criminal appeal against a High Court judgment that reversed the trial court's acquittal and convicted the appellant under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two connected criminal appeals arising from a single incident. Criminal Appeal No.876 of 2013 was filed by the accused (Iqbal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Sections 376 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment of acquittal dated 24 July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 325 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Naga, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-IV, Mysore, for the offence punishable under Section 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Father in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 354, 323 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajay Dhengre, was convicted by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No.48/2016 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 323 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Santosh Deelip Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, for offenses under Sections 376 and 323 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Story. Conviction Under Sections 376, 448, 323, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Hemraj s/o Fulchand Patle, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia, for offences under Sections 448, 323, 376 and 506 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Prafulla Vinayak Nage and Atul Shrikrishna Bhadake, under Section 376(2)(g) (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Baliram s/o Mansingh Chawhan, a Police Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No. 3/1998 for offenc...