Search Results for "deposit"

846 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 846 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Prevention of Corruption Act Case, Reinstating FIR Quashed by High Court. Preliminary Enquiry Not Mandatory Under Section 17 When Superintendent of Police Orders Investigation Based on Detailed Source Report Disclosing Cognizable Offence.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the Karnataka High Court's order quashing proceedings against a public servant for offences under the Preventi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Wife's Death Case - Overturns High Court Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Application of Section 106 Evidence Act - Trial Court's Acquittal Restored

<p>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the husband against his conviction by the High Court under Section 302 of IPC -- The Trial Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rape Case - Discharge Order Restored as Consent Was Not Based on Misconception of Fact - Relationship Between Married Parties Was Consensual

<p>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Appellant against the High Court's order which had set aside his discharge in a rape case -...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employees Against Recovery Orders in Service Law Case Due to Lack of Hearing and Erroneous Employer Interpretation. Recovery of Excess Payments After Retirement Held Illegal as No Misrepresentation by Employees and Based on Equity Principles to Prevent Hardship.

The dispute involved retired stenographers who had been granted financial benefits in 2017 based on the Shetty Commission recommendations, which were ...