Search Results for "consumption otherwise"

720 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 720 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Waiving Late Fees for Delayed Bill of Entry Filing. Late Fee Under Section 46(3) of Customs Act, 1962 Is Mandatory and Not Discretionary for Delayed Filing Beyond Prescribed Period.

The Principal Commissioner of Customs, Pune, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the final order of the Customs, Excise...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against YouTuber for Disparaging Marico's Products in Video Review. Court holds that false and malicious statements in product reviews can constitute disparagement, and interim injunction can be granted even if defendant is not a competitor.

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a company manufacturing and selling various consumer products including hair oils and foods, filed a suit against the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Allegations of Abetment to Suicide and Drug Nexus Require Investigation. Court holds that FIR prima facie discloses cognizable offences under IPC and NDPS Act, and quashing at threshold is not warranted.

The petitioners, sisters of the deceased actor Sushant Singh Rajput, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of RPF Constable for Dispensing with Enquiry Without Sufficient Reasons. Rule 53 of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Requires Recording of Reasons for Dispensing Enquiry.

The petitioner, an ex-Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was dismissed from service by order dated 15 January 2019, dispensing with the ...