ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "arbitration challenge"
1870 result(s) found
Found 1870 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviews Appeals Against Dismissal of Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Redevelopment Dispute. Non-Signatories to Development Agreement Cannot Be Directed to Vacate Premises Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as They Are Not Bound by Agreement.
1 Jul 2025The matter arose from a redevelopment dispute concerning Poddar Apartment, a building comprising ground plus four upper floors with 30 flats, 44 shops...
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Admitted and Heard Commercial Arbitration Appeal Challenging Single Judge's Refusal to Enforce Three Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Section 50 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Involves Enforcement Against Non-Signatory Related Companies and Alleged Asset Diversion Through Demerger Schemes to Defeat Execution of ICC London Awards Totaling Over USD 20 Million.
30 Dec 2025The appeal originated from a dispute between Imax Corporation (appellant) and E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) arising from a Mas...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Injunction Granted Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Injury Set Aside. The court held that an interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires satisfaction of all three principles: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury.
22 Mar 2021The appellants, owners of a property, entered into a development agreement with the respondent developer. Disputes arose, and the respondent filed an ...
- 185
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in MSMED Act Arbitration Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner's alternative remedy by way of appeal was availed and withdrawn, and no grounds for review exist.
24 Aug 2023The petitioner, Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), had co...
- 36
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.
22 Apr 2020The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...
- 219
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Common Judgment in Multiple Arbitration Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards on LPG Cylinder Pricing; Arbitral Awards Rejecting Suppliers' Claims Had Been Upheld by Single Judge; High Court Considers Scope of Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act.
15 Mar 2019The matter involved multiple appeals filed by various LPG cylinder manufacturers against Bharat Petroleum Company Limited (BPCL), a Government of Indi...
- 44
High Court
Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana considers maintainability of Letters Patent Appeals arising from execution proceedings in an international commercial arbitration matter. The Bench examined the preliminary objection that an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is barred by Section 13(2) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 unless the impugned order is appealable under Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
3 Aug 2026The matter before the Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana arose from two Original Side Appeals filed by a company incorporated...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.
30 Jun 2026Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment in Execution of Arbitral Award — WIFPA Dispute Settlement Committee Award Held Enforceable as Arbitration Award Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act. The court held that the dispute settlement mechanism under Article 32(A) of WIFPA's Articles of Association constitutes a valid arbitration agreement and the award is enforceable as a decree.
1 Aug 2013The case involves an appeal by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dismissing its Chamber Summons in ex...
- 66
