Search Results for "Video Evidence"

1144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding Up Order in Company Petition — No Grounds Made Out to Interfere with Company Judge's Discretion. The Court held that the winding up order was justified as the company was unable to pay its debts and it was just and equitable to wind up the company.

The judgment pertains to an appeal filed by Reminiscent India Television Ltd against an order dated 27 July 2010 passed by the learned Company Judge i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Mother Against Father for Custody of Minor Child. Father's Custody Held Not Unlawful as Both Parents Have Equal Rights; Dispute to Be Adjudicated Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

The petitioner, Mrs. Namita Mahendra Thanai, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking production of her mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Industrial Dispute — Tribunal Award Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Court held that the Industrial Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the reference as the dispute was not an industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.4009/1997, on 19th of September, 2007. The pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...