Search Results for "Section 420"

1996 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1996 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager for Criminal Conspiracy and Corruption but Acquits Co-Accused for Lack of Evidence. The court found sufficient evidence against the Branch Manager for forging records and sanctioning loans without jewels, but no evidence against the loanee co-accused.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 21st July 2009, which upheld the conviction of T. Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Will dated 27-05-1985 held not binding on plaintiff as it was not proved to be the last will of the testator.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 06-12-2013 passed by the XXVIII Additional City Civil Judge at Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Complainant's Challenge Against Discharge of Accused in Import Export Act Case. Complaints under Section 5 of Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947 were not maintainable as the Act stood repealed and complaints lacked valid sanction.

The Deputy Chief Controller of Import & Export, Mumbai, filed separate complaints against various accused before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals, Remands Case for Fresh Assessment, Clarifies Taxability of Unauthorised Structures and Reassessment of Land. Unauthorised Structures Held Liable to Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, While Land Already Assessed Cannot Be Reassessed.

The four first appeals before the Bombay High Court arose out of orders passed by the Small Causes Court in municipal appeals concerning the fixation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...