Search Results for "Rule 273"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 273"

631 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 631 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

1 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Notification 14/2010-ST is Clarificatory for Service Tax on Drilling Rigs in Continental Shelf. Appeal Admitted on Questions of Territorial Applicability of Service Tax to Offshore Drilling Services Under Finance Act, 1994.

28 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd., entered into contracts with ONGC in February and May 2009 to provide offshore drilling services using hire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

9 Jan 2021

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

High Court

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Tenancy Act Case Due to Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Notice Issued After 14 Years Regarding Land Transactions Was Barred as Statutory Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Under Sections 63 and 84C of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

21 Jan 2026

The petitioners, constrained to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged a show cause notice dated 12.12.201...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

High Court of Madras Reviews Review Applications in Co-operative Sugar Mill Cases. No Substantive Judgment Text Available for Further Extraction.

28 Mar 2025

No substantive judgment text provided; only case details are available. The case involves a batch of review applications by multiple individuals again...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST Paid on Exported Goods Despite Claim of Higher Drawback Rate. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST under Section 16(3)(b) of IGST Act read with Section 54 of CGST Act and Rule 96 of CGST Rules, as selection of higher drawback column does not disentitle refund.

26 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Kunal Housewares Private Limited, exported stainless steel household articles in July, August, and September 2017. The petitioner paid...

High Court

High Court of Madras Adjudicates Writ Petitions by TWAD Board Against Labour Inspector's Orders on Permanent Status. The Court Examines the Validity of Orders under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act.

10 Mar 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging Removal by No-Confidence Motion. Court holds that removal of a directly elected Sarpanch must be by Gram Sabha under Section 35(1)(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and not by Gram Panchayat members under Section 55(2).

10 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Jijabai Parasram Aatram, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhamandari, a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe Woman. On ...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)