WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017
5 Feb 2019The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...
Search Results for "Original Application"
16743 result(s) found
Found 16743 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power.
13 Aug 2010The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging NCLT Order Approving Resolution Plan Under IBC — Alternative Remedy Under Section 61 IBC Available. The court held that the NCLT's order approving the resolution plan was not vitiated by any jurisdictional error and the writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable.
28 Jan 2020The petitioners, Kotak Investment Advisors Limited and Rahul Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal Order in Service Matter — Seniority and Promotion Dispute Among Tahsildars. Court holds that the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal's interim order directing status quo regarding seniority and promotion of Tahsildars was justified pending final adjudication.
17 Dec 2019The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 22.10.2019 passed ...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.
15 Oct 2024The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...
- 646
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Husband and In-laws Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Complaint Filed at Pune While Shared Household Was in Hyderabad — Held That Jurisdiction Lies Where Cause of Action Arises, Not at Wife's Temporary Residence.
2 Mar 2016The petitioners, the husband and his parents, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the proceedings initiat...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Appointment of Administrator and Cancellation of General Body Meeting in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute. Court holds that Registrar's order appointing administrator without affording hearing to the managing committee and cancelling requisitioned general body meeting was violative of principles of natural justice and provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
19 Nov 2025The petitioners, members of Malboro House Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the order dated 10 October 2025 passed by the Divisional Joi...
- 293
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Stay of Civil Suit Pending Arbitration in Joint Venture Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Joint Venture Agreement Mandates Reference to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
24 Dec 2013The petitioner, M/s Eagle AgroFarm Private Limited, owned certain properties and entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated 9 May 2006 with Responde...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.
6 Feb 2020The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Failure to Implead All Contesting Candidates is Fatal. The court held that the mandatory requirement of joining all contesting candidates cannot be cured by a subsequent application for summons, and the petition is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
26 Nov 2024The petitioner, Shahaji Nanai Thorat, filed an Election Petition challenging the election of Respondent No.7, Sanjay Dina Patil, from the 28-Mumbai No...
- 632
