Search Results for "Mysore Civil Service Rules"

457 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 457 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Balance of Convenience Favors Plaintiff. Trial Court's Order Restraining Defendant from Creating Third Party Interest Upheld as Plaintiff Established Prima Facie Case and Irreparable Loss.

The appellant, Smt. Manisha Kode, challenged an order dated 24.01.2023 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad in Special Civil Suit No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as Not Arbitrary or Perverse.

The appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction in favor of the respondent/plaintiff, M/s Mysore Deep Perfumery Hou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...