KAHC010069912016_1
10 Nov 2016...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Amendment Act 1977"
751 result(s) found
Found 751 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.
1 Jan 2020The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...
- 178
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Suppliers and Dismisses Board's Appeal; Holds Suit for Interest Simpliciter Maintainable under 1993 Act. The Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 applies to contracts entered before its commencement when supplies were made after the Act came into force, and acceptance of principal amount without protest does not bar interest claim.
1 Aug 2026The dispute originated from two separate suits filed by small-scale industrial undertakings, M/s Purbanchal Cables & Conductors Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Shan...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
10 Aug 2022The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...
- 169
Supreme Court
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.
30 Jul 2013The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...
- 214
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.
29 Apr 2024The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...
- 439
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Initiates Suo-Motu Criminal Contempt Proceedings in ISKCON Property Dispute – Judge's Integrity Questioned via Anonymous Letter. Court Holds that Sending Photographs with Inflammatory Captions Amounts to Blackmail and Scandalizing the Court, Prima Facie Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
16 Apr 2015The High Court of Karnataka initiated suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings against certain individuals associated with ISKCON and advocates, arising...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of News Broadcaster's Petition Challenging RBI Refusal to Accept Compounding Applications Under Foreign Exchange Management Act. The Court Examines the Compounding Process and the Validity of the 2017 Amendment to Rule 8(2) Barring Compounding When Section 37A Proceedings Are Contemplated.
26 Jun 2018The petitioner, a public limited news broadcasting company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actio...
- 26
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.
1 Jan 1970This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...
- 62
