Search Results for "Income Tax Act, 1922"

286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Case Allowing Deduction of Expenses Incurred by Partner from Share of Firm's Profits. Partner's Expenditure to Earn Income from Registered Firms is Deductible Under Section 10(2) of Income-tax Act, 1922 Despite Prior Computation of Firm's Profits.

The dispute arose from income tax assessments for the years 1955-56 and 1956-57 concerning Ramniklal Kothari, a partner in four registered firms who d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal Against Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Order Amalgamating Income of Two Assessment Years. Tribunal's Direction to Reassess for 1952-53 and Allowance for Intangible Additions Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 33(4) of Income-tax Act, 1922.

The appeal arose from income-tax assessments for the years 1952-53 and 1953-54 of the respondent-firm. For 1952-53, the Income-tax Officer (ITO) asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Dispute — High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappraising Factual Findings. Compensation Paid Through Assessee to Former Agents Not Deductible Under Section 10(2)(xv) of Income-tax Act, 1922, as No Overriding Title Established.

The respondent, a subsidiary of Imperial Chemical Industries (London), acted as sole selling agent in India for I.C.I. (Export) Ltd., another subsidia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessment of Profit from Land Transaction as Adventure in Nature of Trade. Single Transaction of Purchase and Subdivision of Estate into Plots with Resale Held to Constitute Business Profit Under Section 34(1)(a) of Income-tax Act, 1922.

The assessee, P. M. Mohammad Meerakhan, entered into an agreement on 15th August 1955 to purchase 477.71 acres of land called Kuttikal Estate for Rs. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal on Carry Forward of Losses Under Income-tax Act, 1922. Loss Sustained by Partner in Dissolved Firm Can Be Set Off Against Profit from Another Firm if Same Business Continued by Assessee.

This appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax arose from a dispute over the carry forward and set-off of business losses under the Income-tax Act, 192...