Search Results for "Government Company"

6994 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6994 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Corporate Debtor Against Banks in SARFAESI Act Proceedings — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act as Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Exists.

The appellant, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had availed various credit facilities from a consortiu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Challenge to Insurance Ombudsman Award in Health Insurance Claim Dispute. Court upheld the Ombudsman's jurisdiction and award of Rs.27,13,582/- for medical expenses, rejecting the insurer's arguments on partial repudiation and policy validity.

The case involves a dispute between Bharat Hirji Dedhia (the insured) and Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (the insurer) regarding a health insurance p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Industrial Dispute — Tribunal Award Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Court held that the Industrial Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the reference as the dispute was not an industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.4009/1997, on 19th of September, 2007. The pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...