Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1602 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1602 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SVLDRS-3 Demand for Interest Component Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Interest paid under protest prior to show cause notice is part of tax dues under Section 124(2) of Finance Act, 2019.

The Petitioner, National Centre for the Performing Arts, a public trust registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and engaged in providin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Modvat Credit in Central Excise Case Due to Lockout Causing Delay in Receipt of Goods. Notification dated 30.3.1994 restricting credit after 30.6.1994 for gate passes issued before 1.4.1994 held inapplicable where delay was due to lockout, a force majeure event.

The petitioners, N R C Limited and Mr. Ashokan A., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Notification dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of KVSS Declaration — Post-Manufacturing Expenses Dispute. The court held that an appeal is pending until the order is communicated to the party, and thus the declaration under Section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 was validly filed.

The petitioner, M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing aerated water, soft drinks, and fruit-pulp based drinks, was issu...