Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2031 OF 2018

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validation of DRI Officers' Jurisdiction. Establishing the authority of DRI officers as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Idea Cellular Ltd., challenging the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Prosecution Against Accused in Customs Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 138(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Delay in Filing Complaint Not Explained. Complaint Filed Beyond One-Year Limitation Period Without Any Extension or Explanation, Hence Liable to Be Quashed.

The petitioner, Imtiaz Ahmed, was arraigned as Accused No.2 in CC No.210/2014 pending before the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Dakshina Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Licensing Authorities for Erroneous Licence Leading to 20 Years of Litigation. Petitioner Firm Penalised for Lapses of Licensing Authorities; Court Grants Relief Based on Fair Admission by Respondents.

The petitioner, M/s. General Instruments Co., a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition in the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Trader's Liability for Excise Duty on Job Work Fabrics Under Rule 12B of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Court Held That the Trader Who Gets Fabrics Manufactured Through Job Workers Is Deemed Manufacturer and Liable for Duty, Not the Job Worker.

The case involves appeals by Dinesh Textiles, a trader who got cotton fabrics and made-ups manufactured through job workers, against the order of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows BCCI's Writ Petition Against Service Tax Demand on Media Rights Income. Court holds that BCCI's grant of media rights for IPL matches constitutes 'export of service' and not 'franchisee service', quashing the Order-in-Original and directing rectification of the Tribunal's order.

The petitioner, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 and registere...