Search Results for "Article 22(1) Constitution"

298 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 298 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order in Service Matter Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Petitioner's claim for correction of promotion date after 21 years held to be stale and not maintainable.

The petitioner, a retired customs officer, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing his Original ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction Order in Suit for Right of Way. Court upholds trial court's finding of prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of plaintiffs regarding use of 9-meter road.

The petitioners, original defendant Nos.1, 5, and 6, filed a writ petition challenging the order of temporary injunction granted by the trial court an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Urban Land Ceiling Act After Repeal Proposal. State Government retains jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 until formal repeal takes effect.

The petitioners, nine individuals and one through their power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the decis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Former Director for Tax Dues of Company — No Evidence of Neglect or Misfeasance. Director Who Resigned Before Relevant Assessment Year Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Default Under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Dinesh T. Tailor, was appointed as an Additional director of Yazad Investment & Finance Private Limited on 2 January 1987. He signed a...