Search Results for "Article 16(3)"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Transfer as Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of Employee After 28 Years of Service to Chennai Held Malafide and Without Justification Under Items 3 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Sulzer Pumps India Private Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Thane, which declared that the employer had engag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts — Reassessment Initiated Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 Proviso of Income Tax Act, 1961

The petitioner, Hindoostan Mills Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 30th March 2021 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation's Demand for NOC, Property UID, and Tax Bill for Trade License Renewal. Court holds that renewal of a trade license cannot be conditioned on production of documents not required under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The petitioner, M/s. Venus Rubber Works, a registered partnership firm since 1959, became a sub-tenant of a shop in 1969 and has been carrying on busi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302/34 IPC and Section 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Conspiracy and Involvement of Accused Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of two individuals, Raja Mohammed (D1) and Raj Mohammed (D2), on the night of 28 December 1990 near Sarayananthal, Pap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Process Not Amounting to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Internal Order Deciding Jurisdiction Is Not Appealable Under Section 35 of the Act.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Exchange Dispute Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 — Exchange Deed Without Permission Void, But Voidable Only at Instance of Gaon Sabha or Land Holder

The appeals arise from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 5th July 2007 concerning a dispute over land rights under the Uttar Pradesh Zamind...