WRIT PETITION NO.477 OF 2025
4 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Adjoining Land Owner"
559 result(s) found
Found 559 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorised Permanent Construction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Tenant's temporary structure argument rejected as Appellate Court found MS angles, asbestos sheets, and polythene roof constituted permanent construction causing danger to building.
21 Oct 2024The case involves a dispute between the respondent-landlord, Kadambagiri Estates Pvt. Ltd., and the petitioner-tenant, Mrs. Binaifer Batiwala, over ev...
- 677
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. AGRC's order directing SRA to decide on eligibility of slum dwellers for rehabilitation based on cut-off date upheld as valid exercise of appellate jurisdiction under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.
2 Apr 2024The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Sateri Builders and Developers LLP (the Developer) and Shree Gurukrupa (SRA) Co-operative Ho...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Based on Parity with Adjacent Land. Claimant awarded Rs. 200 per square meter for land acquired for Akoli diversion road, relying on previous judgment in LAC No. 77/2005.
4 Aug 2023The appellant, Smt. Kamlabai Wd/o. Ganeshsingh Parihar, was the owner and possessor of land bearing Survey No. 22/2 admeasuring 0.68 HR situated at Mo...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Landowners' Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Based on Parity and Comparable Sales. Compensation Enhanced to Rs.28.12 per Square Yard for Lands Acquired in 1976 Under Sections 4, 6, and 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as Similar Lands in Comparable Cases Received Same Rate.
23 Sep 2021The dispute involved appeals by original landowners against the High Court's dismissal of their appeals seeking enhanced compensation for lands acquir...
- 236
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Upholding High Court's Market Value Assessment. The Court affirmed the compensation rates based on sale exemplars, growth factor enhancements, and appropriate deductions for development charges under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
8 Apr 2021The Supreme Court of India dealt with multiple civil appeals arising from a land acquisition dispute in Haryana. The proceedings were initiated for ac...
- 252
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases, Upholding Enhanced Compensation for Claimants. The court held that the Reference Court's reliance on sale instances and potential value of land for non-agricultural use was justified, and no deduction for development charges was warranted.
27 Apr 2020The case involves four first appeals filed by the Executive Engineer, Beed Irrigation Division, through Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Cor...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
13 Jun 2019The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...
- 128
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Issues Rule in PIL Challenging Encroachment and Regularisation of Comunidade Lands; Petitioners Allege Violation of Code of Comunidades and Favouritism to Minister.
6 May 2016Two Public Interest Litigation writ petitions (PIL WP No. 15 of 2014 and PIL WP No. 16 of 2014) were filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa chal...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession Upheld. Court holds that the plaintiff's possession over suit plots was established through evidence and the defendants failed to prove their title or prior possession.
30 Jan 2014The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate cou...
- 68
