Search Results for "tenancy claims"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "tenancy claims"

841 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 841 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.

15 Sep 2005

The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Property Dispute — Held That LLP Has No Locus Standi to Seek Impleadment Under Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The court set aside the Joint Charity Commissioner's order allowing impleadment of individuals claiming to be trustees in proceedings under Section 41A, as the LLP was not a party entitled to be heard.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by Bagasarwala Property LLP challenging an order of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Mumbai, dated 15 October 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging AGRC Order — Restores Termination of Developer for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Consents and No-Objection Certificate. Failure to Obtain Consent of 70% Municipal Tenants and Annexure-II from MCGM Justifies Termination Under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slums Areas Act, 1971.

10 Jun 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) which had set aside the terminati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Finds No Error in Revenue Authority's Order Based on Prior Civil Court Decree. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Petition Barred by Delay and Laches.

28 Apr 2014

The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Shankar Bandgar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur, dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Waqf Board Eviction Order — C.E.O. Lacks Power to Decide Title Under Section 54 of Waqf Act, 1995. The court held that the Chief Executive Officer cannot adjudicate title disputes and must relegate parties to the Waqf Tribunal under Section 83 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

17 Feb 2015

The applicant, Ishtaque Ali Sayyad Ali, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 83(2) of the Waqf Act, 1995 challenging an order dated 16th M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment Extending Period for Acquisition of Reserved Land Under Section 127(1) of MRTP Act Applies to Notices Served Before Amendment — Landowner's Right to Deemed Lapse Not Affected Retrospectively.

3 Sep 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arising from a writ petition concerning the interpretation of Section 127(1) of...

Supreme Court

Agreement to Sell Not a Deemed Conveyance Without Transfer of Possession | Tenant’s Possession Not Sufficient | Supreme Court (2026 INSC 59)

15 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Vayyaeti Srinivasarao and set aside the judgment of the High Court, which had affirmed the Trial C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Amendment and Adjournment in Eviction Suit — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Written Statement and Cross-Examine Witnesses. The court held that refusal to allow amendment and adjournment without valid reason violates principles of natural justice under Order 6 Rule 17 and Order 17 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

9 Jun 2005

The petitioner, Shri Rajaram Rau Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th March 200...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)