Search Results for "semen"

321 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Double Murder Based on Extra-Judicial Confession and Medical Evidence. Extra-judicial confession to police patil found voluntary and corroborated by medical evidence of homicidal deaths.

The appellant, Barku Tulshiram More, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of his wife Laxmibai and his father-in-law Karbhari under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Amol Jayram Landge, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge-2, Hingoli, in Special Case (POCSO) No. 34 of 2019...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory, recovery of body, and DNA evidence held sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Deepak Kumar Ganesh Rai Manto, was convicted by the Children's Court at Goa for kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, and for d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 377, 323 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Dadarao Ambadkar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 & Special Judge, Achalpur in Special (POCSO) Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction of Wife for Murder of Husband Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen theory and failure to explain death under Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 led to conviction under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Jaishree Devkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambejogai, for the murder of her husband Rajabhau Devkar under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Failure to Explain Under Section 106 Evidence Act Confirm Guilt Under Sections 366A, 376(2)(f), 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vijay Babasaheb Nanavare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2006 for kidnapping a minor...