Search Results for "section 66(1)"

348 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 348 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as High Court Erred in Relying on Oral Dying Declarations After Discarding Written Ones.

The appellant, Uttam, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife, Pushpabai, by pouring kerosene on her and setting her on fire. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail to Appellant in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults Under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Found to Be an Afterthought in a Property Dispute.

The appellant, Kadubal Govind Gore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrociti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints Against Hospital. The Court held that the Industrial Court correctly declined jurisdiction when the employer-employee relationship was disputed due to contract labour claims, following Supreme Court precedents.

The litigation arose out of writ petitions filed by a group of workers (Aayas and Ward Boys) challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)

Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...