Search Results for "section 34"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 34"

603 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 603 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Overhead Losses and Loss of Profit Claims Based on Hudson's Formula Without Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that an arbitral award granting overhead losses and loss of profit without evidence of actual loss is patently illegal and contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Jan 2013

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment of a Learned Single Judge dated 11 Nove...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interest on Delayed Deposit of Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for delay of about 9 years in depositing compensation after award.

14 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Vasant Balkrishna Wale, filed a writ petition seeking direction for payment of interest on the amount deposited after a period of abou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Time Bar Clause. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that the petitioner failed to raise dispute within 30 days was based on evidence and not perverse, and demurrage was not conditional on indemnity.

30 Jun 2005

The case arises from a contract between Larsen & Toubro Limited (petitioner) and Sunfield Resources Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) for the supply of steaming ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Acquittal of husband and in-laws for murder, dowry death, and cruelty upheld as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and medical evidence did not support homicidal death.

2 May 2005

The case arises from the death of Jayshree, who was married to respondent No.1 Navnath Bhagwan Shelke. The complainant, Shankar Tukaram Mane, father o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Charter Party Dispute Over Repair Costs. ONGC's challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 fails as arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

1 Mar 2005

The case involves an appeal by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against an order of a Single Judge dismissing its petition under Section 34...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Family Arrangement Dispute Involving Public Trust. Clause 16 of MOU directing change in trust management held valid and enforceable under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Feb 2005

The petitioners, Shri Mahavir Prasad Mansinghka and another, challenged an arbitral award dated 25th November, 2002 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Foreign Award Not Challengeable Under Domestic Provisions. The court held that a foreign award cannot be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and mere denial of the agreement does not convert it into a domestic award.

28 Feb 2005

The appeal arose from an order of a single judge dismissing the appellant's petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds single judge's refusal to set aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to challenge.

22 Feb 2005

The Union of India (appellant) had invited tenders for construction work, and Moti Enterprises (respondent) was the successful tenderer. The contract ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award, Upholds Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that an arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the arbitration agreement regarding its jurisdiction is subject to the same limited scrutiny as any other contractual interpretation.

2 Feb 2005

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Violation of Right to Legal Representation Found. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate any denial of opportunity to engage a lawyer before the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Feb 2005

The case involves an appeal against an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, t...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)