WRIT PETITION NO. 890 OF 2025
1 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "re-settlement"
490 result(s) found
Found 490 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions and Bank's Intervention Application — Compensation Determined Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Court held that the Reference Court must consider market value as on the date of notification under Section 11 of the 1894 Act, and that the bank as mortgagee has a right to be heard in compensation proceedings.
16 Jan 2024The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by landowners (Sandesh Vitthal Thakur and others, Dipen Vadodaria, Sharad K Vasant, and M/s. Virat...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Petitions for Katkari Tribe Members Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Held That Landowners Are Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 26(1)(b) and Solatium Under Section 30(1) of the Act, and That the Acquisition Proceedings Were Not Vitiated by Non-Compliance with Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
11 Jan 2024The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by members of the Katkari Scheduled Tribe and other landowners challenging the compensation awarde...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.
5 Jan 2024The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
7 Aug 2020The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...
- 230
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Land Acquisition for Vasant Kunj Scheme. Land Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Policy Preference for Cooperative Societies.
24 Oct 2019The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Government of NCT of Delhi for the Vasant Kunj residential scheme. A notification u...
- 254
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.
23 Oct 2019This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...
- 222
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Land Owners' Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Solatium Under Section 30(1) of the 2013 Act Held Calculable Only on Market Value and Assets, Excluding Additional 12% Under Section 30(3).
17 Jul 2019The case involves two Special Leave Petitions filed by land owners whose land was acquired for the Metro Railway project under the Metro Railways (Con...
- 395
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses NOIDA's Appeals Against Quashing of Land Acquisition Notifications and Compensation Direction. Acquisition Notifications Quashed Due to Illegal Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Section 17 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
5 Mar 2019The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) against the Allahabad High Court's judgment quashing land ac...
- 173
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows LDA Appeal in Land Restoration Case — Development Charges Upheld for Entire Acquired Area. The Court held that development charges under Section 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 are payable if development has been carried out on the acquired land as a whole, not merely on the specific plot, but the quantification must be after giving an opportunity of hearing.
1 Jan 2019The case involves an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) against a Division Bench judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) d...
- 255
