Search Results for "precincts"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death Due to Sudden Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident. Parents of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 as Deceased Was a Bonafide Passenger.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 28/04/2017 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal in OA(IIu)/NGP/2015/0213, whereby the Tribunal reje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Dependents in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased's attempt to board a moving train held to be an untoward incident, not self-inflicted injury, entitling dependents to compensation.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dismissing the claim of the dependents of Deepak Nattuji Thakre, who died af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railways' Appeal in Untoward Incident Death Case. Death of Passenger Due to Fall from Train Caused by Sudden Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Railways) against an award of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, in Claim Application No.16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Passenger Status Upheld. Death of a person found on railway premises with a valid ticket is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the burden to prove negligence or self-inflicted injury lies on the railway.

The case involves an appeal by the dependents of Kiran Yennam, who died in an alleged untoward incident on 04.03.2010. The claimants, his wife, minor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Amputation of Both Legs Due to Fall from Train. Held that the claimant was a bona fide passenger and the incident was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling him to compensation.

The appellant, Nagesh Gulabrao Kale, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, for injuries sustained in an untoward ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989. Fall from Train Due to Jerk and Rush Constitutes Untoward Incident; Tribunal's Rejection Based on Nature of Injuries Set Aside.

The appeal was filed by the original claimants, Nirmala wd/o Nagorao Gadling and Sachin s/o Nagorao Gadling, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal and Upholds Compensation for Accidental Fall from Train. Strict Liability Under Section 124A of Railways Act Applies, Even Without Proof of Railway's Fault, Where Ticket Found on Deceased.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order of the Railways Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, which awarded compensation of Rs. 4,00,000 to the dependen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Accidental Fall from Train Due to Jerk. Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Entitled to ₹8,00,000 Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The present appeal was filed by the Union of India under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the award dated 20.08.2025 p...