Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Tax Revision Against Tribunal Order Restoring Equal Addition and Penalty Under TNVAT Act, 2006. Taxpayer Argues Stock Variation Computed from Notional Trading Method Without Physical Verification Cannot Sustain Penalty Under Section 27(3)(c).

The case involved a tax revision petition filed by M/s. Vista Garments, a registered dealer under the CGST Act, 2017, engaged in manufacturing hosiery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — State Government's Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Violates Section 39(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The Petitioner, Mangal Mahadu Korde, was elected as Sarpanch of Wakalwadi Village Panchayat in 2021. Respondent No.5, a member of the Panchayat, lodge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restores Removal of Up-Sarpanch and Panchayat Member for Illegal Attempt to Transfer Sarpanch's Statutory Powers | Section 39 Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act

The petitioner, elected Sarpanch of Hiware Village Panchayat, sought removal of Respondent Nos. 5 (Up-Sarpanch) and 6 (Member) under Section 39(1) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Income Tax Matter. Jurisdiction lies with High Court where Assessing Officer is located, not where ITAT Bench sits.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Panaji Bench, which had ru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay and Setting Aside Abatement in Second Appeal Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sufficient Cause. Legal heirs failed to explain delay of over 5 years in seeking restoration of appeal after appellant's death.

The present litigation arises from a second appeal filed in 1994 which was disposed of as abated on 20.07.2012 due to the death of the sole appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Acquitted Accused Pending Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 390 CrPC. The court held that the applicant is entitled to bail as a matter of right in view of the decision in State of Maharashtra v. Bapu Pandu Mali, and granted bail subject to conditions.

The applicant, Balkrishna Mahadev Lad, was the original accused in Sessions Case No.276 of 2010 arising from C.R.No.26 of 2010 registered at Gamdevi P...