Search Results for "motor vehicle claims"

1998 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1998 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Sufficient Evidence of Vehicle Involvement. Tribunal erred in dismissing claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 despite FIR, panchnama, and eyewitness testimony establishing involvement of offending vehicle.

The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by the original claimants, Simkiben Bhanabhai Rathod and another, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Grievous Injuries in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.47,592/- Enhanced to Rs.1,00,000/- Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimant's Medical Expenses and Pain and Suffering Considered for Just Compensation.

The appellant, Solanki Dipakbhai Babubhai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.2,00,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Pay and Recover Direction in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable Despite Breach of Policy Conditions. Goods Vehicle Carrying Passenger Does Not Absolve Insurer from Paying Compensation to Third Party Claimants; Insurer Must Recover from Owner.

The appellant, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding. Deceased motorcyclist hit by tempo from behind; court holds tempo driver solely negligent, enhances compensation to Rs.2,58,44,336/- with 9% interest.

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Anil Yadav, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeals by Insurance Company and Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Upheld. Compensation Award of Rs. 7,50,000 Confirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of Balkrushna Khandagale, who died in a collision between a motorcycle ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Petition Under Section 163A MV Act — Claimants Entitled to Compensation as Per Structured Formula Despite Alleged Contributory Negligence.

The appellants, Ashabai, Seema, and Umesh, are the legal representatives of the deceased Kalyan Kothi. They filed a claim petition under Section 163A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Apportionment of Liability Between Two Vehicles Determined. Negligence of KSRTC Bus Driver and Motorcycle Rider Established; Contributory Negligence Not Applicable.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 18th June 2007 involving a KSRTC bus and a Hero Honda Splendor motorcycle, resulting in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased voluntarily pushed stationary truck and came under wheels; court apportions 50% contributory negligence and reduces award from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.50,000.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and minor children of Madhukar Pundlik Mahalley, who died on 3rd December 1989 when he ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Policy Validity and Breach of Conditions Not Proved. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation as No Defence Raised Before Tribunal and No Evidence of Policy Invalidity or Passenger Carriage in Goods Vehicle.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of deceased Wamanrao, who died in a road accident on 18 April ...