Search Results for "minor prosecutrix"

390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partially Allows Criminal Appeal -- Acquits Appellant Under Section 376-AB of IPC In POCSO u/s 4(2)Case Due To Lack Of Kidnapping Evidence -- Convictions Under Sections 363, 354-A(2) and 8 of POCSO maintained Upheld

The appellant challenged his conviction for offences under IPC and POCSO Act. The High Court analyzed the evidence, focusing on the victim's testimony...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping. Trial Court Had Imposed 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offences Against a Minor.

The appellant, original accused no.1, was convicted in Special (POCSO) Case No.94/2017 by the Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Story. Conviction Under Section 376(g) IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape and Victim's Testimony is Full of Omissions.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Section 376(g) IPC. The appellants, Parmeshwar and Vitthal, were convicted by the trial court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Appeal in Human Trafficking Case Involving Cross-Border Offence and Age Determination. The court examines the requirement of sanction under Section 188 CrPC for offences partly committed in India and evaluates medical evidence on victim's age under the POCSO Act.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the High Court of Uttarakhand in a human trafficking case. The appellant, an Indian citizen, was accused of enti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as evidence of victim was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Mr. Sayyad Chand Agasapure, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Section 376(2)(f) to Section 376(1) IPC in Rape of Minor Case — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served. Victim's Age Above 12 Years Makes Section 376(2)(f) Inapplicable, Minimum Sentence Provision Not Attracted.

The appellant, Shahanawaj Shamsuddin Bhadgaonkar, was convicted by the Adhoc District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Girl in Neighbor's House — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offence Under Sections 376, 342, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vishnudas s/o Uddhao Bhagade, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 (rape), 342 (wrongful co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor — Medical and Ocular Evidence Corroborated. Accused convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a 4-year-old girl, sentenced to 10 years RI.

The appellant, Bandu @ Bandya Birasing Rajput, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gr. Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 168 of 1986 for offenc...