Search Results for "loan account settlement"

598 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 598 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Daughters' Partition Appeal Against Father in Hindu Joint Family Property Dispute. Daughters Held Entitled to Share as Coparceners Under Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as Amended by Act 39 of 2005.

The appellants, R. Sandhya and R. Swetha, daughters of S.R. Raju, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of their 1/3 share each in the sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in CBI Trap Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused Public Servant's Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Restored as Trial Court's Acquittal Based on Minor Contradictions Was Perverse.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Shriram Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Malaria Death Insurance Claim. Death Due to Disease Not an Accident Under Section II of National Insurance Home Loan Suraksha Bima Policy.

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission which upheld ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...