Search Results for "first informant"

2434 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2434 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case. Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand of Dowry Soon Before Death Under Section 304-B IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused (Fatima Mahamad Shaikh, Iqbal Mahamad Shaikh, Rafiq Mahamad Shaikh, and Nilofa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. The court upheld the acquittal of four accused under Section 302 read with 34 IPC as the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused (Murlidhar Baburao Chavan, Prakash Murlidhar Chavan, Rajendra Murlidhar Chavan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction Under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Intent Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Kedar Lalkha Tadvi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon in Sessions Case No.29 of 2013 for the offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction in Land Dispute Stabbing Case. Eye witness testimony and medical evidence sufficient to prove guilt under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Subhash Hiraman Bedwal, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.77 of 2015 for the murder of Sultan Gani Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Acquittal of Accused for Murder Under Sections 302, 177 r/w 34 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 1st April 2002 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State Appeal, Convicts Accused in Murder Case Under Sections 302, 307, 147, 149 IPC. Eye-witness testimony found credible and injury on accused plausibly explained, leading to reversal of acquittal for five accused.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal recorded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded in Sessions Case No. 76/1998. The res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Parity with Co-Accused. Alleged Caste-Based Insult Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(r) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Marenna @ Mareppa and Sahebreddy @ Sabreddy, filed separate criminal petitions under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the appellants shared a common object to commit murder.

The appeal arises from the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, in Sessions Case No. 27/1994, convicting the appellants for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convicts in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved — Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 r/w 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Witnesses Turned Hostile and Individual Overt Acts Not Established.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by convicts challenging their conviction in Sessions Case No. 87 of 2014 passed by the Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC — Confirms Three-Year Rigorous Imprisonment and Compensation of Rs.70,000. Revision Petition Dismissed as Concurrent Findings of Fact and Law on Cruelty and Demand for Dowry Are Not Shown to Be Perverse or Unreasonable.

The revision petitioner, Babanrao Dnyandoba Shinde, was the husband of the informant Suvarna Shinde. Their marriage was solemnized in 1993. The wife a...