Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

391 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insolvency Petition Against Deceased Insolvent, Holding Proceedings Abate Upon Death. Insolvency Petition Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 Abates as Act Does Not Permit Substitution of Legal Representatives.

The case involves an insolvency petition filed by Prime Securities Ltd. against Anil Mithalal Shah under the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Mutation Dispute. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Dispute Over Succession Rights to Agricultural Land Requires Civil Court Adjudication.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Yeshwant Jadhav, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, which set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Passes Judgment in Multiple Motor Accident Claim Appeals

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner Club to Permit Mobile Phone Usage at Race Courses Without Additional Entertainment Duty. The Court held that mobile phone use is not entertainment under the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no additional duty is leviable.

The petitioner, The Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., conducts horse races in Mumbai and Pune under a license from the State of Maharashtra under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...